PA Dems: Building Blue

what is Hilary really about?

Clinton Attacks Democratic Activists
April 19, 2008 12:16 PM

A year ago, at a virtual town hall sponsored by the liberal group MoveOn, Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., lauded the group.

"You've been asking the tough questions; you've been refusing to back down when any of us who are in political leadership are not living up to the standards that we should set for ourselves," she said. "I think you have helped to change the face of American politics for the better."

What a difference a year -- and access to a private fundraiser -- make.

Yesterday the Huffington Post's Celeste Fremon posted comments Clinton made after Super Tuesday at a small private fundraiser in which she disparaged the group and Democratic activists in general.

"Moveon.org endorsed" Obama, she said, "which is like a gusher of money that never seems to slow down. We have been less successful in caucuses because it brings out the activist base of the Democratic Party.

"MoveOn didn't even want us to go into Afghanistan," Clinton said -- falsely, according to the group. "I mean, that's what we're dealing with. And you know they turn out in great numbers. And they are very driven by their view of our positions, and It's primarily national security and foreign policy that drives them. I don't agree with them. They know I don't agree with them. So they flood into these caucuses and dominate them and really intimidate people who actually show up to support me."

Barack Hussein Obama wants voters to decide the nomination based on who can coolly and competently run the country. He had better hope they don’t study his recent campaign too closely for the answer. Obama has overseen major staff shake-ups in two months. He has left a trail of judgement issues that the Republicans will more than happy bring up in the general election, and unhappy voters that had to listen to his own campaign accepting of the Racist and Anti-American advisersto they keep close by. His campaign badly underestimated his main adversary, Senator Hillary Clinton, miscalculated the importance of organizing swing states and was caught flat-footed after failing to lock up the nomination on Super Tuesday. The Obama [...] campaign has been marked by strategic missteps, confused uncertainty and personnel drama.

And recently his negative ads are saturating our airways...so don't even say he doesn't run a negative campaign. But the Obamanites will find a way to accept this as a way to respond to the ads of truth that Senator Clinton is running.
We will turn back the arrogance and down-speaking mumbo jumbo from this snakeoil salesman.
GO PA!!!

Luckily she doesn't own the people. People vote.

The fact that so many who support her, particularly women, don't really know about her, is proof that the media hasn't reported the Clinton facts over the years.

The Democrats are partly responsibly for this dumbing down. Any reporting of those nasty Clinton facts was quickly attributed as Republican trouble-making. Annie Oakley, herself, led the barrage against Republicans, going on the Today Show and telling the world about "the great right wing conspiracy," when the media had caught on to her husband's sordid affair with Monica Lewinsky.

And now this woman wants to be president, and she wants to make her impeached and disgraced husband a roving ambassador.

I think not.

We don't admire abused women who reward their abusers. We would be in a sorry place if we adopted such twisted thinking as normal.

I agree with you. Hillary owns CNN.

This is equal to the "Bitter" comment. MoveOn represents a larger segment to include Pennsylvania voters, but this won't even make it to CNN. Does this answer who CNN is for? Understand this people! I'm not whining! I'm saying come out and say you are for Hillary CNN. I'm tired of hearing, "Oh we hit Obama the hardest because he is the front runner..." She is the wife of the former leader of the free-world. If she disparages a large segment like MoveOn shouldn't it be big news on CNN everyday like the "Bitter" thing?